socialistexan:

justsomeantifas:

sentientdessert:

justsomeantifas:

exerian:

justsomeantifas:

them: comedy doesnt write itself

reality coming in hot with a rude awakening:

In case you were wondering if HRC was anything more than just a toy of the billionaires’

💅

Of course he means human rights…  becuse he doesn’t see anyone with a net worth of less than him as one…  and he likes to treat himself well.

🔍👀

The HRC has been trash though.

The former director of the HRC said trans rights would be included in their advocacy, “over my dead body.”

They and Barney Frank specifically excluded trans people from legislation and used us as a trading chip to try (and fail) to get ENDA passed in negotiations with the extremely homophobic Bush administration.

They also repeatedly have misgendered trans staffers and have called them “tranny” in private.

HRC been neo-liberal, boarder line reactionary, trash. Throw them out with Emily’s List and the DCCC.

Do you realize that we have to pay for food because farmers have to be paid too? If food was free, no one would want to be a farmer because they would get nothing out of growing crops.

leftistcrap:

justsomeantifas:

youre bad at math huh? probably from the shit capitalist system that actively encourages math inadequacy.

Farmers need to be paid.

If food were free, farmers would not be paid.

Assumptions made: The only possible source of compensation for farmers is money, the only possible source of money for farmers is through directly charging the consumers of their crops, the only customers farmers have are the direct individual consumers of food made from those crops, and that farmers are currently paid directly from the sale of crops.

So my counterpoints would be that A) money isn’t the only form of compensation nor is it the one desired by most economic actors, rather it is the things that money gets them (food, water, electricity, gas) that fuels the supposed desire for money; B) a farmer can be provided with money or other types of compensation through mechanisms other than the sale of goods for profit; C) the average customer of any given farm tends to be corporations rather than individual consumers; and D) corporations also tend to be the owners of farms and pay the farmers wages, typically low wages at that, which do not vary based on output or profit but rather are fixed to the amount of time spent working.

If you wanted farmers to be compensated fairly, you should be an advocate for worker ownership of the means of production, not capitalism.

what do you think about the Batman dick pic

feministbatman:

feministbatman:

we’ve been seeing female characters drawn with their nipples pointing out of their clothes, with cameltoe poppin’ out of leather pants somehow, with thong leotards with their butt cheeks flapping in the wind. is about time we saw some super men dick if u ask me

image

Honestly I read the bleeding cool article when the news broke and laughed my ass off.

“Many retailers were okay with a butt crack…. But a Batpenis on full display in many areas of the United States of America is a different story entirely. There are calls to make the comic returnable. Or maybe reprinted with the original shadow.”

I have to ask, where is this energy when Supergirl, a 16 year old character, has dozens of panty shots with her skirt just so? Are these people who are upset and demanding returnable orders over a rated M comic book with a penis inside it also upset when a RHATO 32, a rated T comic book, had Starfire wearing what is essentially lingerie lounging seductively on a sports car with her perfectly round magic breasts?

Bruce Wayne has an anatomically sized penis that was drawn without sexualization in a book meant to be purchased and read by adults and comic stores are freaking out and want their money back. They’re weak as hell. Bruce’s nude body was drawn with more respect than the clothed bodies of teenage girls.

Where’s the outrage over that?

mjalti:

me, drinking tea: pls leaf water….sage my body of the demons of my past…steam my colon…let me know peace

me, drinking coffee: I beg of u bean juice….cleanse me of the curse of sleep….make my heart beat like a tribal drum in ceremony….let me conquer this building

thesinisstronginthisone:

counsellorsuggestion:

counsellorsuggestion:

rottentrauma:

counsellorsuggestion:

stop insulting yourself. it doesn’t help.

But what if it’s true

it still doesn’t help. you can call yourself as many names as you want, but it won’t make you a better, happier, healthier or kinder person.

punishment doesn’t work. only positive reinforcement does. be kind to yourself and get better.

#but like#what should i do instead??#i know i shouldnt insult myself but also theres nothing to compliment imho#thats my predicament

try speaking neutrally about yourself!

“you fucking idi- it’s not that big a mistake.”

“you’re worthle- it’s okay.”

“you’ll never amount to- well, i’m doing alright, i guess.”

ever heard the phrase “if you can’t say anything nice, don’t say anything at all”? that applies not to just to others but to yourself as well. it’s better to think neutrally or not at all than negatively. and once you’ve got into the habit of that, it’s much easier to move to uplifting yourself!

This sort of thinking is so important! I have a tactic that for every negative thing I think about myself, I must say a positive thing, preferably of equal severity and related to the same thing is possible (eg “ugh my hair looks gross” vs “my eyes look really pretty” or “I’m a burden on my friends” vs “i always try to make time to listen to them” or even just “my shoes are so scuffed” vs “my shirt looks awesome”). It’s a good way to realise that for every tiny flaw you nitpick about yourself, there’s gonna be a tiny trait that’s just really neat.

I feel like I should say I actually got this idea from doing self reflection and evaluations at school! Using this method will not only help your self image, but also how you complete evaluations at schoop and work – you can only benefit from it!

pointlesslypointing:

lunarcentric:

apistogrammacacatuoides:

tankies:

apistogrammacacatuoides:

tankies:

It’s amazing you can make up any death toll you want for communism and people automatically believe it but if you say “capitalism causes people to die because they simply don’t have access to enough money to pay for necessities” you’re making up a death toll and it’s not capitalism that caused anything.

Yeah, but are there death camps and gulags propping us capitalism?

Yes, literally. Have you heard of prison slave labor or…

No I grew up in the American South and have never heard of a prison farm, not once, thing is, usually, to get in on of those, you are convicted of a crime (and don’t fucking dare claim that the “justice” system of communist states is better than the worst Jim Crow South) and a crazy thing: sometimes you get released from prison, like when you serve your sentence,

What’s the quality of life in North Korea again?

Hi, I’m Black and I live in the south.

Yes, the prison-industrial complex is real and yes, considering over 3,000,000 are in prison in the United States, almost an entire percent of our population which is larger than any other incarcerated population on this planet, Yeah I’d say communist states have more justice than us Americans. In the future, please don’t use Jim Crow to trivialize black life as if it hasn’t faced some of its worst history living under white, capitalist states. In fact, if you’d like to talk about the genocide against the indigenous populations, you’ll find that a near complete erasure of an entire continent of people, both physically and culturally, is worse than anything communism has ever done.

Also, there is no homelessness in Pyongyang.

Here are some sources, dipshit:

https://www.alternet.org/grayzone-project/trump-media-antisemitic-black-book-communism-whitewash-nazis

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLN0FlxE6vY5DlAPO1runQHOZSYyxePI1O